|
S.179a - The River Forest Project (Clinton Place and William Street) River Forest, Illinois It is no surprise that houses are
newly attributed to Wright even after all these years. Recordkeeping was not always precise, and
the measure of his involvement in the works of others from his office cannot
always be calculated. He may have
approved initial designs, but others may have made changes he would not
approve. Work carried on when he was
out of the country, and sometimes apprentices’ contributions overtook the
Master’s. Some of these “recent finds” are
uncontroversial, such as discoveries of modified prefab designs. Others, like these houses in River Forest,
generate a hive of controversy in which absolute proof is impossible and
theories (speculation?) might have a difficult time in a court of law. Of course, the origin of a design ordinarily
does not become a legal issue, so the controversy is limited to college
classrooms and Wright chatrooms. Thus we find the homes on Clinton
Place and William Street, identified to an unconvinced jury of peers as being
designed by Wright himself. Many in
the architectural community credit Harry Robinson as the designer, and regard
these homes as “bootleg” designs while Robinson was employed by Wright. Prof. Storrer, however, has identified these as Wright
designs with common elements, many being mirror images of each other,
based on interior details that suggest FLW, Lloyd Wright, and John
Wright. This causes additional
concern: if we have to rely on interior details to define a Wright design, how
often will we have the privilege of entering and measuring private
residences? Prof. Storrer rejects the theory of
Robinson design, arguing that Robinson never took credit for this output when
applying for government work. Others
point out that Wright never claimed them, either. Storrer counters that Wright must have
agreed to keep his name off the paperwork, due to his reputation during this
time. I will point out that his
blatant womanizing never kept him humble or sympathetic to clients’ feelings
(heck, he even took a client’s wife). Other sites have mentioned these
properties, but without a lot of details.
They have largely avoided a comprehensive list of addresses (some
don’t even mention the city). Without
concluding which side is correct, I offer the neighborhood here. Prof. Storrer’s 4th edition of his
catalog groups these homes under the catalog number S.179a and identifies
original owners. Their catalog numbers
are grouped based on the basic design (there are ten basic designs). Those designs were reversed, flipped
around, or otherwise modified to make each house look unique. I have organized them by address, though. Photographed on May 5, 2014. |
Clinton Place – all
claimed to be Wright
S.179.43a – Harry Hogan model house, 609 Clinton Place
S.179.24a – Clark H. Sherman Residence, 625 Clinton Place
William Street – all
claimed to be Wright
Only one
house on this block of 26 structures has not been claimed to be Wright’s – the
corner house at 706 William. Our tour
begins on the even side of the street.
S.179.11a – N.N. Souther Residence, 710 William Street
S.179.21a – R.N. Fellows Residence, 714 William Street
S.179.31a – F.W. Collins Residence, 718 William Street
S.179.12a – M.F. Russell Residence, 722 William Street
S.179.41a – W.C. Gaddis Residence, 726 William Street
S.179.22a – A.E. Olson Residence, 730 William Street
S.179.51a – L.E. Murphy Residence, 734
William Street
S.179.32a – Dr. I.A. Toren Residence,
738 William Street
S.179.13a – Samuel Wilson Residence, 742 William Street
S.179.52a – S.R. Flett Residence, 746 William Street
S.179.61a – S.D. Roberts Residence, 750 William Street
S.179.42a – E.G. Wheeler Residence, 754 William Street
754 William Street (details)
S.179.72a – J.J. Willis Residence, 755 William Street
S.179.73a – D.H. Davis Residence, 751 William Street
S.179.X0a – C.J. Burras Residence, 747 William Street
In May 2018 a
permit was issued by the village to allow demolition of this home and the
house
S.179.93a – F.J. Hinckley Residence, 743 William Street
S.179.63a – C.J. LaMena Residence, 739 William Street
S.179.71a – Frank Winters Residence, 735 William Street
S.179.82a – W.H. Gordon Residence, 731 William Street
S.179.91a – P.W. Hazelton Residence, 727 William Street
S.179.92a – W.C. Rohray Residence, 723 William Street
S.179.81a – Roy Iverson Residence, 719 William Street
S.179.62a – G.G. Towers Residence, 715 William Street
S.179.23a – F.R. Donahue Residence, 711 William Street
S.179.14a – McClintock Residence, 707 William Street
Update
2015/2016
In 2015 one
of Prof. Storrer’s associates announced that another
house had been identified by his staff as a Wright design. Although they did not disclose the precise
address, I was able to determine that they are referring to the James Heald house at 715 Clinton Place in River Forest – a block
from the previously identified houses on Clinton. Despite the confidence with which this
discovery was announced, this particular property was not included in Prof. Storrer’s 4th
edition and Prairie
School Traveler reports that Prof. Storrer now
regards this as a Lloyd Wright design.
It should be
pointed out that this area is loaded with prairie style architecture from many
architects (including Wright apprentices).
In 2013 the Village of River Forest Historic Preservation Commission
issued a report
cataloging all historic properties in the community. That report continued to credit these “newly
discovered” Wright homes to Harry Robinson – including this new find at 715
Clinton Place (photographed on March 29, 2016).
James Heald House, 715 Clinton
Place
Attributed to Lloyd Wright by Prairie
School Traveler website
Just to show
how confusing all of this can be, here is a neighboring house that is not claimed to be a Wright design. The prevalence of prairie designs by various architects
(including former Wright apprentices) can boggle the mind:
719 Clinton Place – not claimed to be by Wright – attributed
to John S. Van Bergen
The white house to the right is 715 Clinton Place
New
08/20/2014 Revised
05/11/2018 |